ၾကက္ဥႏွင့္ ၾကက္မ ဘယ္သင္းက အေရွ႕လာသလဲဟု မဲျပာပုဆိုး စကားထာေဟာင္း တစ္ခုအား ေမးျမန္းခဲ့လွ်င္ အရြယ္ေရာက္ၿပီး ပုဂၢိဳလ္တစ္ဦး အေနျဖင့္ တစ္ခုခုအား ေရြးခ်ယ္ရပ္တည္ကာ အမိုက္ခံလိမ့္မည္မဟုတ္ဟု မေန႔ကထိ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ ယံုၾကည္ခဲ့ပါသည္။ သို႔ေသာ္ ယေန႔တြင္ ထိုယံုၾကည္ခ်က္အား ဆက္လက္ဆုပ္ကိုင္ထားရန္ မျဖစ္ႏိုင္ေတာ့သည့္ သတင္းတစ္ပုဒ္ကို ဖတ္႐ႈလိုက္ရသည္။ ယခုအခါ ထိုအရာႏွစ္ခုထဲမွ တစ္ခုအား ေရြးခ်ယ္ရပ္တည္သူ လူစြမ္းေကာင္းမ်ား ေပၚထြက္လာခဲ့ၿပီ ျဖစ္သည္။ အဆိုပါ ပေဟဠိအား အေျဖညွိႏိုင္ခဲ့ၿပီ ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သိပၸံပညာရွင္မ်ားက ေၾကျငာခဲ့ၾကသည္။ သူတို႔၏ ရပ္တည္ခ်က္မွာ ၾကက္မ ျဖစ္ပါသည္။ ၾကက္မသည္သာ အရင္ဦးစြာ ျဖစ္ထြန္းလာခဲ့သည္ဟု ၎တို႔က ဆိုသည္။
ရွဖွီး (University of Sheffield) ႏွင့္ ၀ါး၀စ္ခ္ (University of Warwick) တကၠသိုလ္တို႔မွ အဖြဲ႕တစ္ဖြဲ႕က Ovocleidin ၊ အတိုေကာက္ (OC-17) ဟုေခၚသည့္ ပရိုတိန္းဓာတ္တစ္မ်ဳိးကို ရွာေဖြေတြ႕ရွိခဲ့ၾကသည္။ အဆိုပါ ပရိုတိန္းဓာတ္သည္ ၾကက္ဥအခြံ၏ ဖြဲ႕စည္းပံုတြင္ အရင္းအႏွစ္က်သည့္ ဓာတ္တစ္မ်ဳိးျဖစ္သည္။ သေႏၶလြယ္ထားသည့္ ၾကက္မ၏ သားအိမ္အတြင္းမွ ၎ဓာတ္ကို ထုတ္လုပ္သျဖင့္ ကၽြန္ေတာ္တို႔၏ ၾကက္ဥ/ၾကက္မပုစၦာအား ေျဖရွင္းၿပီးသားျဖစ္ခဲ့ၿပီဟု သိပၸံပညာရွင္တို႔က ဆိုသည္။ အဖြဲ႕သားမ်ားသည္ HECToR ဟုေခၚသည့္ အဆင့္ျမင့္ကြန္ျပဴတာကို အသံုးျပဳ၍ ဥခြံတစ္ခု၏ ေမာ္လီက်ဴးတည္ေဆာက္ပံုအား ေလ့လာခဲ့ၾကသည္။ OC-17 သည္ ၾကက္မ၏ ကိုယ္ခႏၶာအတြင္းမွ ကယ္စီယမ္ကာဗြန္နိတ္ အသြင္ကူးေျပာင္းမႈအား အရွိန္အဟုန္ျဖင့္ ျဖစ္ေပၚေစသည့္ ဓာတ္ျပဳပစၥည္းသဖြယ္ ေဆာင္ရြက္သည္။ ဤသည္မွာ ၾကက္ကေလး ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေနခ်ိန္တြင္ ၾကက္ဥအႏွစ္ႏွင့္တကြ ၎၏ ႏူးညံ့လွသည့္ အရည္မ်ားအား ကာကြယ္ေပးသည့္ ၾကက္ဥအခြံအား ဖန္တီးလိုက္ျခင္းပင္ျဖစ္သည္။ ယခုအခါ သိပၸံရွင္မ်ားက ဤေအာင္ျမင္မႈသည္ ပစၥည္းအသစ္မ်ား ဖန္တီးထုတ္လုပ္ရာတြင္ အကူအညီေပးႏိုင္လိမ့္မည္ဟု ေမွ်ာ္လင့္ေနၾကသည္။
သို႔ရာတြင္ ၾကက္ဥအခြံထုတ္လုပ္ေသာ ပရိုတိန္းဓာတ္အား ပိုင္ဆိုင္သည့္ ပထမဦးဆံုးၾကက္မသည္ မည္သို႔မည္ပံု ျဖစ္ေပၚလာသနည္းဆိုသည့္ ကိစၥႏွင့္ ပတ္သက္၍မူ သိပၸံပညာရွင္တို႔၏ ေတြ႕ရွိခ်က္တြင္ တစ္စြန္းတစ္စမွ် မပါရွိေပ။ တစ္ဖက္သတ္ ေျပာခ်င္ရာေျပာၿပီး ဖုန္းခ်သြားျခင္း ခံလိုက္ရသလို ေငါင္ေငါင္ႀကီး က်န္ရစ္ခဲ့ရသည္။ ဤသည္မွာ သိပၸံသတင္းတစ္ရပ္သာျဖစ္ၿပီး ဒႆနေရးရာႏွင့္ပတ္သက္၍ တန္ဖိုးတစ္စံုတစ္ရာ မရွိပါ။ မည္သို႔ပင္ျဖစ္ေစ ၾကက္ဥၾကက္မပုစၦာသည္ ကေလးငယ္တစ္ေယာက္အဖို႔ စဥ္းစားေတြးဆစရာ ျပႆနာတစ္ရပ္အျဖစ္သာ ဆက္လက္ တည္ရွိေနပါလိမ့္ဦးမည္။ ၾကက္ဥအခြံ ျဖစ္ေပၚေစသည့္ဓာတ္ မေျပာႏွင့္ အႏွစ္ေရာ အကာပါမက်န္ ၾကက္ဥတစ္လံုးလံုးအား (ထံုးစံအတိုင္း “အတု” ေပါ့ေလ) ကိုေရႊတရုတ္မ်ား ေကာင္းေကာင္း ထုတ္လုပ္ႏိုင္ခဲ့ၾကသည္မွာ အေတာ္ၾကာခဲ့ၿပီျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း အေနာက္တိုင္း ေလာကဓာတ္ဆရာႀကီးမ်ား မသိၾကေလေရာ့သလားဟုသာ ေတြးေနမိေတာ့သည္။
◄ ေတဇာ ►
Ref: Hindustan Times
It well depends on which "point of view" you look things from. Pls look at an article 4 years ago. It came up with a totally different conclusion.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article726081.ece
Thanks! I followed this link and was asked for subscription fee 1 pound. :P I wonder if you could kindly send me via e-mail this article. It's interesting what you mention 'different conclusion'. I guess, it would more concern with the science rather than philosophical riddle.
ReplyDeleteI labeled it as "News" here though I know, I used incorrect way of writing, putting my opinions, viewpoints so that betrayed unique news form.
Here is the article.
ReplyDelete"How two philosophers and a farmer cracked an age-old conundrum"
'It was the egg that came first, not the chicken, according to a study of the poultry pecking order.'
By Alan Hamilton
IT IS the ultimate conundrum of the poultry world, debated by generations of scientists, academics and philosophers.
Which came first: the oval thing with the hard shell, or the dim-witted, toothless bird that clucks as it crosses the road for no obvious reason? Now two of the best brains in the land (and a chicken farmer) claim to have solved the catch 22. The answer, it has been decreed, is the egg.
And here follows the science, expressed as far as possible in terms a reasonably educated hen would understand.
Genetic material does not change during an animal’s life. Therefore, the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must first have existed as an embryo inside an egg.
Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, who was put to work on the dilemma, said that the pecking order was perfectly clear: the living organism inside the eggshell would have the same DNA as the chicken that it would become.
“Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg,” he said. “So I would conclude that the egg came first.”
David Papineau, an academic specialising in the philosophy of science at King’s College London, concurred. In his view, the first chicken came from an egg, which, he claims, proves that there were chicken eggs before there were chickens. Here, the science moves out of reach of the hen-brained. Professor Papineau maintained that people were mistaken if they argued that the first chicken egg was a mutant produced by non-chicken parents.
“I would argue that it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it,” he said. “If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg.”
It is perhaps best at this difficultjuncture to gloss over the fact that a kangaroo is a marsupial and does not lay eggs in the way that chickens or ostriches do — or all. Rather, it gives birth to a joey.
Also, a kangaroo bouncing around the Outback would be highly unlikely to come across an ostrich with which to attempt such an unlikely union. These overgrown birds inhabit an altogether different continent.
Charles Bourns, a chicken farmer and chairman of the trade body Great British Chicken, also favours the egg argument. He said: “Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs.”
If they had been around so long, and were presumably missing their best-before date stamp, they would have been best avoided.
The “chicken v egg” debate was prompted by the Disney film studio to mark the release of its movie Chicken Little on DVD.
But the learned discussion poses more questions than it answers. Creationists, for example, will argue that if God created Adam and Eve, he probably had a spare five minutes to knock up a chicken as well.
Science still has many unanswered questions, such as what existed before space? What do you come to when you pass the restaurant at the end of the universe?
If a tree falls in the forest and there is no one there to hear it, does it still make a noise? And exactly which law of physics will allow Michael Ballack enough time away from the Chelsea playing field to soend £130,000 a week?
But the biggest question of all remains unanswered: what laid that first egg, if it wasn’t a chicken?
It's very cool and reasonable article, especially, as it mentioned the same overall problem that remain unsolved, what laid the first (so-called) egg that produced chicken. The facts and speculations in this article make sense while the latest news from Hindustan Times is rather superficial and just a hyperbole in philosophical sense. (just a science news with trickery headline, let me say) Even if this conundrum can be solved scientifically by Darwinism, it's more beautiful, in my opinion, to think about as Catch-22 or a paradox.
ReplyDeleteI can't help to say thank you for your helpful hands. :)